[WikiEN-l] Proposal: limited extension of semi-protection policy

[maru dubshinki]

On 5/19/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
>
> Semi-protection seems to be a great success in many cases. I think that
> it should be extended, but carefully, in a couple of key ways.
>
> 1. It seems that some very high profile articles like [[George W.
> Bush]] are destined to be semi-protected all the time or nearly all the
> time. I support continued occassional experimention by anyone who wants
> to take the responsibility of guarding it, but it seems likely to me
> that we will keep such articles semi-protected almost continuously.
>
> If that is true, then the template at the time is misleading and scary
> and distracting to readers. I propose that we eliminate the requirement
> that semi-protected articles have to announce themselves as such to the
> general public. They can be categorized as necessary, of course, so
> that editors who take an interest in making sure things are not
> excessively semi-protected can do so, but there seems to me to be little
> benefit in announcing it to the entire world in such a confusing fashion.
........

I have to disagree with you here. Wikipedia is famous as the
Encyclopedia "anyone can edit". If a random anon sees a page and tries
to edit it, and cannot (while the main page still proclaims how
everyone can edit), they are going to be dreadfully confused- lord
knows enough are confused by the basic idea without adding on a second
level of possible confusion. Perhaps two templates: the scary one for
temporary semiprotection, and another, more discreet one for the more
permanent ones?

~maru