[WikiEN-l] William M. Connolley- He wrote about the edit wars but it makes no sense!!!!!!!!! (Hganesan)

[Harish Ganesan]

And also I have already discussed ENOUGH on the
discussion pages for Steve Nash and nobody can reply
to what I wrote. If I DISCUSS it and nobody can reply
or make a good reason why not to include something IN
MY OPINION, then it stays right??? These are all FACTS
BTW THAT I POST THAT RELATE. TOO MUCH BIAS ON SOME OF
THESE SPORTS PAGES. 

--- wikien-l-request at Wikipedia.org wrote:

> Send WikiEN-l mailing list submissions to
> 	wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web,
> visit
> 	http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body
> 'help' to
> 	wikien-l-request at Wikipedia.org
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	wikien-l-owner at Wikipedia.org
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it
> is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of WikiEN-l digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Deletion before discussion (Drini drini)
>    2. Re: Deletion before discussion (Katie
> (keitei))
>    3. Re: Message: 4 William M. Connolley- He wrote
> about the	edit
>       (Earthhope Action Network)
>    4. Re: Message: 4 William M. Connolley- He wrote
> about	theedit
>       (Peter Mackay)
>    5. Re: CSD T1 (geni)
>    6. Re: Deletion before discussion (geni)
>    7. Re: Darren at nocuffs (Guy Chapman aka JzG)
>    8. Re: 7. Re: Zero information is preferred to
> misleading	or
>       false (Guy Chapman aka JzG)
>    9. Re: 7. Re: Zero information is preferred to
>       (Earthhope Action Network)
> 
> 
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 21:31:43 -0500
> From: "Drini drini" <wpdrini at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Deletion before discussion
> To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
> Message-ID:
> 
>
<ca57470e0605171931t2e85f199i8cf010dc92e91d0f at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> EXCEPT... that Wikipedia is not your personal blog
> nor a free webhost
> (**Official policy** at [[WP:NOT]] ). Userspace IS
> SUPPOSED to be
> relted to your wikipedia work, not to post pictures
> of your family.
> If you misuse it, don't cry about it later.
> And , do you really think vandals will care about
> the copyright? they
> WILL get the pictures and post them anyway.
> 
> Wikipedia IS AN ENCYCLOPEDIA not an scrapbook, but
> there's plenty of
> sites where you can put your family pictures if you
> like
> 
> 
> On 5/17/06, Rob <gamaliel8 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 5/17/06, Ben McIlwain <cydeweys at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Steve Bennett wrote:
> > > > On 5/17/06, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >> I'm afaraid we don't allow "with permission"
> images.
> > > >
> > > > Even in userspace? Was that an intentional
> decision? Does it apply
> > when
> > > > people upload photos of themselves?
> > >
> > > /Especially/ in userspace (in articles you can
> at least make a case for
> > > fair use).  And people had better be uploading
> those pictures of
> > > themselves under free licenses such as GFDL, CC,
> or PD.
> >
> > Why?
> >
> > If I ever wanted to put a pic of myself or my kids
> on WP, I wouldn't
> > want to release it under a free (or free-ish)
> license so every troll I
> > block for vandalism could put my family on their
> webpage.  Of course,
> > they can already do that, but not legally, for
> what it's worth.
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> >
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 17 May 2006 22:54:34 -0400
> From: "Katie (keitei)" <katiefromuncyc at gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Deletion before discussion
> To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l at wikipedia.org>
> Message-ID:
> 
>
<bf1babc10605171954w501a69a9ged8585c03d10a0f5 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> On 5/17/06, Philip Welch <wikipedia at philwelch.net>
> wrote:
> > On May 17, 2006, at 2:59 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:
> >
> > > Even in userspace? Was that an intentional
> decision? Does it apply
> > > when
> > > people upload photos of themselves?
> >
> > People should release photos of themselves under
> GFDL or CC-BY-SA if
> > they upload them. If they aren't the original
> photographer they
> > should not upload other people's copyrighted
> photos to Wikipedia.
> >
> > --
> > Philip L. Welch
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Philwelch
> >
> >
> 
> The image this thread was originally about did have
> a CC license. It's
> technically a free license, just not THE free
> license. CC-BY-NC-SA
> should be allowed in userpages, in my opinion.
> 
> -- 
> -Katie
> http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/User:Keitei
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Keitei
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 00:06:57 -0400
> From: "Earthhope Action Network"
> <contact at earthhopenetwork.net>
> Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] Message: 4 William M.
> Connolley- He wrote
> 	about the	edit
> To: wikien-l at Wikipedia.org
> Message-ID:
> 
>
<bf12aac60605172106o354a1ba9j9a95040cb8c70573 at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1;
> format=flowed
> 
> > Subject: [WikiEN-l] William M. Connolley- He wrote
> about the
> > edit wars butit makes no sense!!!!!!!!!
> >
> >
> > Why? Because the other wikipedians are vandalizing
> and
> > deleting ALL THE FACTS I WRITE that completely
> RELATE
> > TO THE SUBJECT. I did not do anything wrong this
> time,
> > but he is upset by the info I post. I am steaming
> > about this. He is a horrible admin.
> 
> You'll find any number of other editors who agree
> with you, but this isn't
> the place to discuss it. As advised, use the article
> discussion page to talk
> about it in a civil and constructive manner. If you
> still cannot get
> justice*, come back with a couple of good examples
> and ask for help. Don't
> expect much if you are being a self-righteous pest.
> 
> Pete, speaking from experience
> 
> *Justice is a nebulous concept here. Wikipedia is
> just a website. It's not a
> 
=== message truncated ===


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com