[WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking

Steve Bennett stevage at gmail.com
Fri May 5 23:28:33 UTC 2006

On 5/5/06, Philip Welch <wikipedia at philwelch.net> wrote:
> Undue weight. It's absurd for Pokemon to have 10,000 times more
> coverage within Wikipedia as, for instance, 19th century philosophy.

Yes, but that's not "undue weight", which afaik, only applies to
coverage of topics within a single article. Excessive coverage of one
topic wrt another is simply {{sofixit}}...


More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list