[WikiEN-l] We need a policy against vote-stacking
Steve Bennett
stevage at gmail.com
Thu May 4 21:43:25 UTC 2006
On 04/05/06, Jimmy Wales <jwales at wikia.com> wrote:
> I have an example, based on a nice dinner conversation I had with Sam
> Wantman. Sam knows a lot about bridges, and there is a subcommunity of
> people who know each other and work on bridge articles. Super. This is
> why our stuff on bridges is super excellent.
>
> If a bridge is listed on AfD, the result is of course likely to be a
> horrific mess. People who don't know anything about bridges are likely
> to vote based on pre-existing battles going on there between
> inclusionists and deletionists. If someone cares deeply about the
> issue, they can campaign for random other friends to come and vote. The
> admins who go through and clean it up will find it very difficult to
> figure out what to do, having little idea of the reputations of the
> various parties, and therefore have no choice to follow the disastrously
> bad rule of "one user account, one vote" ... even though this includes
> the votes of trolls, newbies, sockpuppets, meatpuppets, idiots *and*
> people who know what they are talking about and should be the ones deciding.
>
> Wouldn't it be better in this case to say, you know what, we actually
> have bridge experts, people who know about bridges, and these people
> ought to be the ones deciding, not random people on AfD.
Replace "bridge" with "Pokemon character" and you'll see the problem :)
Steve
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list