[WikiEN-l] Verifiability equating to notability

[geni]

On 5/3/06, Steve Bennett <stevage at gmail.com> wrote:
> Why do we delete "horrible" articles if they don't shape up "really
> soon"? What's soon? Why don't we want horrible articles hanging around
> for 2 years? Are "horrible" articles better or worse than stubs on the
> same topics?
>

They can often be worse


> > By the way, [[LUG]]s generally aren't attached to streets, they're
> > usually attached to entire metropolitan areas.  In fact, I suspect a
> > well-written article on the [[Suncoast Linux Users Group]], for
> > example, would survive a VFD vote today.
>
> I'm sad to hear that well-writtenness is a criteria in AfDs. If it's
> not well-written someone should just fix it.
>

Someone?

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Cleanup_by_month

15000 articles.

Looks like anyone who might be that someone has enough work on their
hands already.
--
geni