[WikiEN-l] Cruft

[Joe Anderson]

By saying Only 91 edits. This is first to this namespace I was attempting to
insert fact without opinion.

On 5/2/06, Joe Anderson <computerjoe.mailinglist at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> John, Not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia due to limited scope
> of interest is pretty much what I thought it meant.
>
>
> On 5/2/06, John Lee <johnleemk at gawab.com> wrote:
> >
> > Kelly Martin wrote:
> >
> > >On 5/2/06, Joe Anderson <computerjoe.mailinglist at googlemail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >>I accept that some may see it as uncivil, but I for one do not.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> > >In my opinion calling content contributed in good faith by our valued
> > >contributors "cruft" is incivil.  It sends the clear message that
> > >their contributions, and by extension themselves, are valueless.  Why
> > >can't you just say "Not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia due
> > >to limited scope of interest"?
> > >
> > >Kelly
> > >
> > >
> > What if what Joe took "cruft" to mean what you just said? After all,
> > isn't that what it *does* mean? Why the stigmatism?
> >
> > John
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> Joe Anderson
>
> [[User:Computerjoe]] on en, fr, de, simple, Meta and Commons.
>



--
Joe Anderson

[[User:Computerjoe]] on en, fr, de, simple, Meta and Commons.