[WikiEN-l] Philosophical question re sources

[Ray Saintonge]

Mikkerpikker wrote:

>>We don't "prove" anything. We just take his claim out of the article.
>>
>>Ryan
>>    
>>
>
>I think the point is we *can't* simply take the claim out because it
>satisfies [[WP:V]]. And since there are no rebuttals that does satisfy
>[[WP:V]] the article in question becomes POV by virtue of the fact
>that there are no views cited to challenge it.
>
That's not logical.  If there are no views expressed  that challenge the 
premise, it necessarily represents the Neutral Point of View. A 
rebutting argument that is not verifiable is as good as no argument at all.

Ec