[WikiEN-l] Verifiability and Africa
Ray Saintonge
saintonge at telus.net
Thu Mar 23 00:28:03 UTC 2006
Geoffrey Burling wrote:
>On Thu, 2 Mar 2006, Nicholas Moreau wrote:
>
>
>>Africa was brought up in discussion of verifiability. This raises an important question, should/can we be lax references for African content in en?
>>
>> Suppose a tribes' elder writes an article on his village, he'll do it based on oral history, or one-off documents. This information may be recorded in books, but these books are stashed away in libraries miles upon miles away.
>>
>> What happens then? It's true information, but there's little or no available sources for the writer to cite.
>>
>>
>Welcome to my challenge: writing articles about Ethiopia (& neighboring
>countries) where I can provide adequate sources. The short report on this
>challenge is that sometimes I'm successful, & sometimes I'm not; compared to
>a number of other topics one could write about for Wikipedia, verification
>is currently harder, & for the forseeable future will likely remain so.
>
Oral histories have a role to play. In Canada the Supreme Court has in
the past given credence to oral histories in establishing land claims of
the First Nations of British Columbia.
>The longer report on this challenge is as follows. The problem of
>"oral history" isn't as insurmountable as it might first appear: a large
>number of field researchers spent the 20th century combing Africa &
>recording oral historical traditions, so a lot of material that one might
>expect to find in an encyclopedia is in print, & can be verified. Getting
>ahold of the printed accounts might pose a challenge of one kind or
>another: for example, I own a copy of Richard Pankhurst's quite informative
>_Economic History of Ethiopia_ (which covers the years 1800-1935), but it
>had a first printing of 4,000 copies, so I don't know if someone else could
>easily verify any material I might draw from it.
>
Hmmm! Published in Addis Abeba in 1968. (not exactly the best place to
publish if you want high circulation. :-) ) 4 copies available through
Abebooks, with the cheapest at US$59.37. The pre-1800 volume was
published in London and can be had for $14.31
>But that is a problem with
>every specialized discipline. (Anyone else on the list own a copy of
>_Ancient Near Eastern Texts Relating to the Old Testament_? It's another
>valuable work, but not one found in the average public library.)
>
32 copies available through Abebooks with the cheapest being for US$75.00
The point for me is that these are easy to track down, and I'm confident
that I could verify the material if I took an interest in the subject.
Ec
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list