[WikiEN-l] [Wikipedia-l] "Fatally Flawed" -- Internal Britannica Review Tackles Nature Methods

[geni]

On 3/22/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
> But does Wikipedia plan to be around in fifty years time?

Does anything on the internet? Shear bulk means something will be
around in 50 years but if it will be a long dead hulk or a distant
ansestor of whatever it evolves into remains to be seen

>Britannica does.

So have many things. Considering the ammount information transmission
has changed over the last 100 years I doubt anything longer than say a
decade can be reasonably planed.

--
geni