[WikiEN-l] "Fatally Flawed" -- Internal Britannica Review Tackles Nature Methods

[Mathias Schindler]

On 3/22/06, SJ <2.718281828 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Below is a letter that Britannica sent out today to some of its
> customers, in response to the December Nature article comparing the
> accuracy of articles in Wikipedia and Britannica.  A more detailed
> review of the Nature study, including responses to each alleged error
> and omission, is linked from the front page of www.eb.com.

This is pretty important and from all I've read so far, one could be
in the situation to support Britannicas call to Nature to retract the
story and make a better one.

Mathias