[WikiEN-l] Philosophical question re sources

[Matt Brown]

On 3/21/06, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:
> We don't have to include every view merely because we can verify that
> someone, somewhere holds that view.   Even if policy supports that (and I
> strongly suspect it doesn't; see "undue weight"), that would be damaging the
> article for the sake of process. Which is something we don't do on
> Wikipedia.

The thing is that the article is about Paul Smith's organisation,
named "Safe Speed", and thus his organisation's claims and opinions
are definitively "on topic".  If it was a general article on road
safety issues, his organisation's claims might be removed as an
unsupported minority opinion given undue weight, but they can't be
here.

-Matt