[WikiEN-l] The new verifiability policy

[Katefan0]

What other word would you suggest, then?  It's certainly more permissive
than "shall."

k


On 3/1/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
>
> Katefan0 wrote:
>
> >Personally, I think it's just about right that the policy state that
> >information without a source may be removed.  (Perhaps it should be more
> >pointed -- disputed information without a source).  Didn't Jimbo say as
> much
> >in one of his responses to Seigenthaler?
> >
> Part of the problem is with the permissive word "may", which is too
> often read as though it were "shall".
>
> Ec
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>