[WikiEN-l] 3RR policy proposal: No "Gotcha" rule
Puppy
puppy at KillerChihuahua.com
Tue Jun 27 19:12:11 UTC 2006
> From: "Steve Bennett" <stevagewp at gmail.com>
>
> On 6/23/06, Warren Blanco <fireislandparadise at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Lack of warning
>>
>> A 3RR ban cannot be imposed against an editor who has not been
warned that
>> he or she is in danger of violating the 3RR. A ban can only be
imposed when
>> an editor violates the 3RR after receiving a warning even if he or
she has
>> already tecnically violated the 3RR prior to receiving a warning.
>>
>
> Strongly oppose. Admins should use discretion in not blocking unwarned
> users, but they shouldn't be prevented from doing so. 3RR is already
> subject to gaming, and it only works because it's so strict. Giving
> more escape clauses is a bad idea.
>
> Steve
>
I also strongly oppose. There is already protection for new users who
may be unaware of the rules; most Admins already try to avoid BITE-ing
newcomers. This would open the door to even more abuse than we have
currently; IMHO the goal is correctly to reduce edit warring, not
increase wiki-lawyering.
-kc-
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list