[WikiEN-l] And you thought Pokémon was trivial...

[George Herbert]

On 6/23/06, Bryan Derksen <bryan.derksen at shaw.ca> wrote:
> As I've argued before when this sort of suggestion has come up, we can't
>  let the perfect be the enemy of the good. Articles lacking sources
> aren't unacceptable, IMO, they're simply _unfinished_. They'd need to be
> properly verified before they were accepted for any sort of polished
> compilation, sure, but Wikipedia as a whole is not that compilation. It
> is the raw materials for one.

Is there a project or such of people who can go around focusing on
adding references?

Would adding references be a useful thing to encourage as class
projects for college students, etc?


-- 
-george william herbert
gherbert at retro.com / george.herbert at gmail.com