[WikiEN-l] Oversight log

[stevertigo]

TK: 
"Unfortunately this means that the log itself has to
be kept private. Those people with oversight can view
it. No one else can."

What people seem to disagree with is with the notion
that the log "has to be kept private" due to someone's
claim of 'legally problematic revisions.' Is Google
facilitating the "damage of Starbucks' reputation" by
not removing "consumer whore" from its Image searches?

Understanding that legal systems are not always
reasonable, WM cant reasonably be responsible for
everything in the history of its articles. And to say
the risk is great is simply to court the clique of
privelege who think they can simply make a phone call
and get things deleted through a privileged legalistic
and back-door process -- for what everyone else does
with the edit button.

Stevertigo


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?  Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around 
http://mail.yahoo.com