[WikiEN-l] Delete Daniel Brandt

[Fred Bauder]

I'm afraid he is a notable figure. We should not have some kind of  
hatchet job on him, but someone who has engaged in all the public  
activity he has is certain deserving of a Wikipedia article. Of  
course, he is not a terrorist in the sense Timothy McVeigh was; he is  
just a critic. He makes a point now and then, but from the  
perspective of users whose privacy is at risk he is more of a  
destructive vandal. His point about anonymous people wielding power  
has some traction, but I notice that folks who edit under their own  
name receive more or less the same treatment as people who use  
pseudonyms.

Fred

On Jun 12, 2006, at 11:45 PM, mboverload wrote:

> Just a note:  Just browsed through the shit-swamp that is Wikipedia  
> Review
> and Daniel Brandt has just found another thing to complain about:  Us
> equating his threats with terrorist demands. Oh yeah, and he's not  
> even
> happy that you guys are considering deleting his article.  He's not  
> happy at
> all.  He's moaning that you didn't debate the "ethics" of having an  
> article
> on him and are just doing it to get rid of him.  Sad.