[WikiEN-l] Types of categories
Ilmari Karonen
nospam at vyznev.net
Sun Jun 4 21:01:26 UTC 2006
Steve Bennett wrote:
>
> The problem there, now that I think about it, is that Paris should not
> be in the category "Paris" (as was pointed out by someone else).
Actually, if we consider "Paris" a thematic category, then it makes
sense for Paris to be in it, since it certainly fits the theme.
But I do agree that the category "Paris" should not be a subcategory of
"European capitals", since the things in the "Paris" category (with one
possible exception) are not European capitals.
> Hmm, the difficulty is deciding what "subcategory" really means. I
> assume you're getting at the fact that a taxonomic subcategory should
> simply be getting more specific, and leading to more specialised
> subjects (so "Capitals of Europe" might have subcat "Capitals of
> Western Europe" or "Capitals of the European Union"), maintaining the
> "X is a Capital of Europe" mantra.
>
> In this case, it would seem best that "Districts of Paris" was a
> category of the thematic category "Paris".
...which could, however, be a subcategory of "France", which in turn
could be a subcategory of "Europe" -- all of these being thematic
categories, and each theme being a subset of its parent theme.
In fact, we _could_ have a parallel taxonomic category tree that focused
solely on geography, with "Districts of Paris" being a subset of
"Places in Paris", which in turn is a subset of "Places in France" (but
_not_ "Cities in France") and "Places in Europe" and ultimately
"Places". So we'd have a tree of taxonomic "Places in [Region]"
categories, each one having subcategories named either "[Divisions] in
[Region]" or "Places in [Subregion]", with the root of the tree being
"Places". (I'm torn on whether we'd need a second-level category
"Places on Earth", though.)
So, to summarize what I believe has been proposed:
Taxonomic categories (plural):
* Subcategories are subsets (and always taxonomic).
* Members are instances.
Thematic categories (singular):
* Subcategories are subthemes (thematic) or sets of related things
(taxonomic).
* Members are related things.
The plural/singular distinction may not be ideal, but does feel very
natural in many cases. It's not without problems, though: what about,
for example, the category "Sheep"?
--
Ilmari Karonen
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list