[WikiEN-l] fancruft

[Steve Bennett]

On 7/24/06, ScottL <scott at mu.org> wrote:
>   I think the point is that we are not suppose to be writing "literary
> criticism", or at least not *originating* it.  That would be OR!  FOr
> the parts of the articles that consist of literary criticism we are
> suppose to be summarizing not creating.
>
>   However, an article on a fictional work is not a literary critique,
> it has some of that in it.   However in this case it is an encyclopedia
> article and depending on the work may include a lot more, some of which
> are facts that can (only?) be verified from the original work.

This is totally correct.

Steve