[WikiEN-l] The wiki Paradoxes from my perspective (was Re: Uploading images should be a privilige, not a right)
Fred Bauder
fredbaud at ctelco.net
Fri Jul 21 13:45:14 UTC 2006
On Jul 21, 2006, at 7:39 AM, Michael Hopcroft wrote:
> Some problems I see with this:
>
> If you are doing an article on any subject related to popular culture,
> you are in a serious bind, because any film, television or comic image
> is under copyright BY DEFINITION, even if the creators of the work you
> are illustrating the article about had nothing to do with that image's
> creation. For example, ANY picture of Superman would be in violation
> regardless of its age or source, because the image of Superman is
> itself
> someone else's intellectual property (in this case Time Warner).
>
> This, and the dispute over fancruft in the other thread, is
> compounding
> the dillemma I am facing over whether I can accept the idea of
> contuing
> to be involved with Wikipedia. If uploading images is such a
> legally and
> ethically complicated thing, then is not the editing of Wikipedia
> itself
> even more so? The civil penalties for libel and slander are much more
> severe than those for copyright violation, after all.
>
> My point is that I find myself questioning, almost as I did at the
> beginning of my involvement with the project, the reason for it and
> the
> point to it. The very concept of "An encyclopedia anyone can edit"
> is a
> complete contradiction in logic. The purpose of any encyclopedia is to
> provide a reliable baseline from which one can gain enough
> groundwork to
> do additional research about a topic without being led horrifically
> astray. This purpose is utterly defeated by the ability of anyone,
> anywhere in the world to alter and delete articles at will. while one
> can certainbly show off what one knows or thinks he knows by editing
> Wikipedia, the question is what does anyone actually gain from
> READING it?
>
> I am wondering whether we are not all engaged in some gigantic folly
> that is destroying not only our own credibility but that of the
> Internet
> as a whole.
I think the way to look at it is from the improvement that your own
editing makes to the project. Everyone's small improvements add up to
something very useful.
Fred
More information about the WikiEN-l
mailing list