[WikiEN-l] Human dignity

[Sydney aka FloNight]

---- Anthony <wikilegal at inbox.org> wrote: 
> On 7/14/06, Sydney aka FloNight <poore5 at adelphia.net> wrote:
> > Angela, for example, is known for a small area of her life if we go by verifiable, reliable sources. For that reason the information is best covered in another article.
> >
> The thing is, Angela has gotten involved with a number of different
> things: Wikipedia/Wikimedia, Wikia, and Ourmedia (two non-profits and
> a for-profit, all of which are relatively well-known, and all of which
> have their own Wikipedia articles).  I really don't think it makes
> sense to mention this in every single one of those articles - what
> makes sense is to have a single article which links to each.
> 
> > Of course for dignity reasons, it is worse when the only thing that someone is famous for may be one small stupid mistake.
> >
> I think human dignity is certainly a factor, though I'd probably
> phrase it as right to privacy.  In fact, the first time one particular
> article went up for deletion (I think it was Jimbo, but it might have
> been Angela), I voted to delete it out of respect for their wishes.
> Wikipedia/Wikimedia has gotten a lot bigger since then (I'm not even
> sure if the latter existed at the time), as has Wikia, and at this
> point I think the public right to know outweighs the individual right
> to privacy, at least so long as the article is kept narrow.
> 
> Anthony

Anthony,

Angela is mentioned in these articles even though she has an article.
Are you saying that we should take her information out of these articles?

Sydney