[WikiEN-l] Here's an interesting one

[Steve Bennett]

On 1/30/06, Rob <gamaliel8 at gmail.com> wrote:
> If someone disagrees with a keep result, then lists it on DRV, this is seen
> by many as an "abuse of process" and an effort to "get the result he
> wanted".
>
> It seems that if one type of result can be reviewed and possibly overturned,
> what's wrong with reviewing another type of result?  What's the difference?

Wikipedia suffers more from an incorrect deletion than from an
incorrect keep. Sort of how society suffers more from the execution of
an innocent person than the incorrect non-execution of a guilty one.

More specifically: Wikipedia suffers from having vast numbers of crap
articles. It doesn't suffer a great deal from having a single crap
article, if that article is not a copyvio or libel.

Steve