[WikiEN-l] More on WT:AFD

[Michael Lindeen]

This is my first post here. Heya. I'm woohookitty. He of 10 gazillion
edits. :) Anyway, I agree with Sean here. The arbcom cannot get rid of
afd even if they wanted to. They cannot nuke it from orbit. I can't
even see how it could come up in an arbcom case. They take user
conduct disputes, not policy disputes per se. Mike

On 1/28/06, Sean Barrett <sean at epoptic.org> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Tony Sidaway stated for the record:
>
> > I'm not going to get involved with this.  At this stage the only thing
> > that can help Wikipedia's deletion process is to have it nuked from
> > orbit.  Only the Foundation can do that, if the new arbitration
> > committee is too scared to act.
>
> The Arbitration Committee is a judiciary, not a legislature.  We weren't
> elected to design and implement organizational structures and processes.
>
> Until we have a case, we have nothing to do.  When are we going to see
> "Tony Sidaway v. Afd" on our docket?
>
> - --
>  Sean Barrett     | Some days it's just not worth filing
>  sean at epoptic.org | the environmental impact statement.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFD24+5MAt1wyd9d+URAjnaAJ9JvLufYWOGk4pZ3B8fTL8Jn0LBZgCfSYnD
> AJ4uCucC/+Yv96Hggg6mAS0=
> =dUOd
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>