[WikiEN-l] Dealing with crap deletion nominations

[SCZenz]

I know I'm getting into this late, but I'm gonna start from the top anyway...

Why not reform WP:DRV into something everyone can live with?  We could
give it more authority to overrule AfD, based on things other than
process, for example.  If you want oversight of AfD nominations, by
all means put it there--but I don't think having a single person with
broad review powers is a good idea at all.

SCZenz

On 1/22/06, David Gerard <fun at thingy.apana.org.au> wrote:
>
> Some AFD regulars seem to view AFD/DRV as an independent fiefdom which
> claims dominion over all Wikipedia content, but resists all comment from
> outside (e.g. wikien-l) as interference. *Unfortunately*, it's been causing
> real problems for the Foundation of late. Unbelievable rudeness about
> outsiders, stupendously crap nominations to make a point, actively driving
> away outside experts, etc.
>
> Here is a suggestion: good faith is not enough when the good-faith actions
> are stupidly destructive. Incivility on *FD = 24 hour ban from all *FD
> pages and deletion of comment. Sufficiently crap nomination = 1 month ban
> from all *FD pages.
>
> Ideas?
>
>
> - d.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>