[WikiEN-l] Pointless deletions, bogus guidelines

[Ray Saintonge]

Sean Barrett wrote:

>geni stated for the record:
>  
>
>>On 1/21/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
>>    
>>
>>>Welll, I'd say that it's a very good reason to use your noggin and
>>>reverse its most egregiously borked decisions. Something that you may
>>>have noticed some of us are quite adept at doing.  Looks like Jimmy
>>>Wales took a leaf from our book! :)
>>>      
>>>
>>Not really. Your recent record only looks good compared to your out of
>>process deletion record.
>>
>>geni
>>    
>>
>"Out of process" -- that means "bad," right?
>
>Does it matter what the result was?
>
Absolutely!  You can't allow facts to interfere with process, or nothing 
would get accomplished ;-)

Ec