[WikiEN-l] Re: Nobs

[Snowspinner]

Splitting the subject off of the sensible discussion that's going on...

"responding to it once during an arbcom hearing" is an interesting  
way to describe using your entire user page as a sustained personal  
attack. And what narrow specialist subject do you consider yourself  
an expert on again? Political hatchet jobs?

-Snowspinner

On Jan 11, 2006, at 11:05 AM, Rob Smith wrote:

> Enduring six months of personal attacks, responding to it once  
> during an
> ArbCom Hearing, and being banned for a year, while those who  
> trashed me and
> smeared me as being "banned for personal attacks" are given license  
> to do it
> again. This why the image and reputation of Wikipedia, and the  
> image and
> reputation of editors contributing in good faith is everything.
>
> nobs
>
>
> On 1/11/06, David Gerard <dgerard at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Nobs01 wrote:
>>
>>> Take it from a user victimized by the concerted efforts of  
>>> sockpuppet
>> trolls
>>> given licence to run rampant throughout Wikipedia: Reputation is
>> everything.
>>
>>
>> You were banned for personal attacks and placed on probation after
>> that for disruption:
>>
>>
>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_arbitration/ 
>> Nobs01_and_others#Nobs01_banned_for_personal_attacks
>>
>> Oddly enough, cases like yours are not what I was talking about.
>>
>>
>> - d.
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l