[WikiEN-l] Thread breakage

[Sam Spade]

I don't know what your talking about, but if you explain it more
clearly, and in a more polite tone, I may be of some assistance.

Sam Spade

On 1/7/06, Alphax (Wikipedia email) <alphasigmax at gmail.com> wrote:
> Sam Spade wrote:
> > I totally agree with the need for this. It's not about replacing human
> > judgment, it's about giving tools to improve human judgment. For any
> > proposal to work though, I think we need a way of indicating that an
> > edit was "bad" in some sense.  In eBay parlance, it would be like
> > negative feedback. But at least with that, you could start to count the
> > number of good/bad edits for a user. It would be incredibly handy to
> > know that a given user was +11,000 (56% good) (in other words, a very
> > active but controversial user - probably a pain in the arse), as
> > compared to +300 (99% good) - new, but doing a great job.
> >
> > Any system can be gamed - you just have to make it not worth anyone's
> > time.  Google pagerank can be gamed, but it takes a lot of effort and is
> > very difficult to do cheaply.
> >
> > Steve
> >
> > I also very much like this proposal. If nothing else it would clarify
> > me for who I am, and give certain people alot less room to insult and
> > stigmatise others based on tarbaby terms like "troll".
> >
> > Sam Spade
> >
>
> Damnit, can you PLEASE stop replying to MY messages, including what
> SOMEONE ELSE wrote, and not quoting it properly?
>
> --
> Alphax - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax
> Contributor to Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
> "We make the internet not suck" - Jimbo Wales
> Public key: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Alphax/OpenPGP
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>
>
>
>