[WikiEN-l] Worthy admins? (was "The userbox fad")

[Garion1000]

On 1/5/06, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:

> On 1/5/06, Garion1000 <garion1000 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Many supreme courts or international courts do work like this though.
> They
> > consist for instance totally of 10 judges but some cases are just taken
> up
> > by three of them. I haven't encountered any inconsistencies there.
> > Although
> > I do not know how they solved it. Probably because they have and use a
> > good
> > bureaucratic system.
>
>
> Two points:
>
> (1) WP:ISNOT a bureaucracy. :-) I had to get that out there.


I should have seen that one coming. :)



> (2) I'm probably more interested in the lower-court system since I'm from
> the United States and I'm modelling this after the Supremer Court. My main
> point, however, is that while increasing the number of Arbs may improve
> the
> situation, it couldn't improve the situtation any more than a lower court
> system would also- but the lower court system would have fewer possible
> drawbacks.


I think lower courts would make it even more like a bureaucracy. Now it's
Arb and perhaps an appeal to Jimbo. WIth a lower court it would be one more
step. Besides the RFC and other dispute procedures.

Not that I have a perfect solution though. :)

Garion


> Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>