[WikiEN-l] Wikipedia's destiny

[David Gerard]

>"If you have an idea that you think should become part of the corpus of
>knowledge that is Wikipedia, the best approach is to arrange to have
>your results published in a peer-reviewed journal or reputable news
>outlet, and then document your work in an appropriately non-partisan
>manner."


    http://www.english.ufl.edu/imagetext/

See what I mean about the dangers of reasoning from personal
ignorance? Now I eagerly await objections that don't boil down to "but
webcomics are worse for Wikipedia than Pokemon."

(Part of the webcomics debacle was an attempt to get Snowspinner
excluded from webcomics deletion discussions because as an expert he
was obviously biased on the subject. Not in any particular direction,
but *by being an expert*.)


- d.