geniice at gmail.com
Mon Feb 27 13:41:57 UTC 2006
On 2/27/06, Tony Sidaway <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2/27/06, Phil Boswell <phil.boswell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > "Tony Sidaway" <f.crdfa at gmail.com> wrote in
> > message news:605709b90602251844m45dd7f2btbcc9107f42160fac at mail.gmail.com...
> > > On 2/26/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net>
> > > wrote:
> > >> Nonsense expected if any administrator can tag as divisive.
> > > I don't see any sense in encouraging this:
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rangers_F.C.&action=history
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manchester_City_F.C.&action=history
> > > http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Manchester_United_F.C.&action=history
> > Have the particular changes to which you refer scrolled down beloew my local
> > horizon?
> No. The nature and quantity of the edits visible in the history are
> simply intended to demonstrate that football is a ready source of
Last I cheacked there had been a total of 1 war over football.
Languages are much more contiversal
Turkey has this objection to people speaking kurdish
The english did their best to wipe out welsh
Langauge is a key part of culture. As a result it a rather extream
source of factionalism.
More information about the WikiEN-l