[WikiEN-l] Boston Globe: "Bias, sabotage haunt Wikipedia's free world"

Jon thagudearbh at yahoo.co.uk
Mon Feb 13 08:20:46 UTC 2006


There are three other Boston Globe articles.
   
  The other one appearing on 12 February, entitled Questions of Fact, is here:
   
  http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/02/12/questions_of_fact/
  
 
  The second part of the main story, Many contributors, common cause, is here:
   
  http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/02/13/many_contributors_common_cause/
   
   
  which includes comments from a number of local (to Boston, MA) Wikipedians.
   
  Accompanying today's article is another piece, The idealists, the optimists, and the world they share, which has further comments from WPians:
   
  http://www.boston.com/business/technology/articles/2006/02/13/the_idealists_the_optimists_and_the_world_they_share/
  
Kind regards
   
  Jon
   
  The Cunctator <cunctator at gmail.com> wrote:
  On 2/12/06, John Lee wrote:
> Daniel P. B. Smith wrote:
>
> > http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2006/02/12/
> > bias_sabotage_haunt_wikipedias_free_world/
> >
> > First of a two-parter. Seems pretty good to me, the reporter has done
> > some work, it's not just a hatchet job. But it's pretty negative
> > about Wikipedia.
> >
> > There is a discrepancy between what WIkipedians know Wikipedia to be
> > and what outsiders think it is.
> >
> > They think it's an encyclopedia.
> >
> > That discrepancy is going to cause us more and more trouble unless we
> > find a better way to deal with it.
>
> That was seriously one of the best articles I've ever seen written about
> us. I've shot an email to the author thanking him for doing his research
> instead of shabbily ommitting and making up stuff to support a
> particular viewpoint as most other journalists do. I don't think it's
> negative at all; I find it highlights some of the best and worst parts
> of Wikipedia and would probably comply with [[WP:NPOV]], if not [[WP:NOR]].

I think it places too much emphasis on the idea of fighting vandalism,
but then so do a lot of editors these days. I wrote the author about
the obvious factual error, "On his own, Seigenthaler tracked down the
saboteur to a business in Nashville." As if.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l


		
---------------------------------
To help you stay safe and secure online, we've developed the all new Yahoo! Security Centre.


More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list