[WikiEN-l] Arbcom has completely lost its mind

[charles matthews]

"Jay Converse" wrote

>This sets a bad precedent.

See for example [[argument from setting a precedent]].

>If someone decides they don't like gay
people because they might edit gay articles to be pro-gay even with no
established history of even editing those articles, all they have to do is
point to "Well, we banned pedophiles for having an inborn POV too, didn't
we?" and then Process(tm)(r) will dictate that since it happened before, we
should let it happen again.

See for example the actual charter wording, as being quoted in one of the 
decisions.

It is in any case 100% obvious that gay people are not going to be banned.

Charles