[WikiEN-l] Main Page Featured Article

[George Herbert]

On 12/20/06, Guy Chapman aka JzG <guy.chapman at spamcop.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 20 Dec 2006 17:53:32 +0000, "Thomas Dalton"
> <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> Yeah, but if it was on a voluntary basis, it wouldn't be that much work
> >> after the initial rush.  Not every trusted user would want/need access
> to
> >> templates, for instance.
>
> >A lot of them would want it despite not needing it - everyone wants to
> >be trusted. Maybe a specific "template" group, rather than a more
> >general "trusted" group would be good, it would make it easier to
> >convince people that it's "no big deal".
>
> The real problem here is that trusted users should be given the sysop
> bit and are not.  No big deal?  Not these days.
>
> Guy (JzG)



Could be a worse deal.

I think I understand why my RFA was controversial and failed, and to some
degree the "please don't be too controversial" RFA criterion makes a lot of
sense.


-- 
-george william herbert
george.herbert at gmail.com