[WikiEN-l] The boundaries of OR (contd)

[Steve Bennett]

On 12/21/06, Thomas Dalton <thomas.dalton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A while back I wrote about a self-publicising vanity author. One of
> > the details I'd liked to have note was the complete (or near-complete)
> > absence of his books in public library catalogues, but it's almost
> > impossible to actually find a way to cite a "negative search" much
> > less a positive result...
>
> Indeed, that would end up being OR - quite simple OR, but OR all the
> same. It's annoying when you know something that apparently no-one has
> published, but there isn't much we can do about it. (Unless you happen
> to be an expert on the subject and can publish it yourself)

If that is OR then WP:NOR is a broken rule.

Steve