[WikiEN-l] "Assume good faith" is no longer policy.

[Parker Peters]

On 12/18/06, Ken Arromdee <arromdee at rahul.net> wrote:
>
> I haven't participated in any of the discussion about Assume Good Faith,
> but
> in my experience, I've usually encountered it when users quote it to claim
> that criticism of them is equivalent to not assuming good faith.
>
> Does it really solve more problems than it causes?
>

I'd say it causes more problems than it solves, precisely because it's an
instant "veto" to valid questions of whether someone is trying to POV push
or has a conflict of interest.

Parker