[WikiEN-l] Office actions

[Stephen Bain]

On 12/15/06, Ray Saintonge <saintonge at telus.net> wrote:
> Stephen Bain wrote:
> >Editors are accountable for their own actions.
> >
> >The Foundation rightly does not want to be accountable for other
> >people's actions.

<snip>
> Surely the foundation is not responsible for
> the legal defence of its editors, but a plaintiff is likely to want to
> make the Foundation at least a co-defendent in a law suit, It should be
> prepared to defend itself against groundless, vexatious, or SLAPP
> lawsuits.  If it ends up defending an editor at the same time so much
> the better.

I was speaking in the general case, to explain one common reason why
people like Danny and Brad don't speak on every matter they are asked
to speak on.

To bring this back to the specific case at hand, the article once
again has the assertion that the institution is unaccredited, but
there are no sources cited to verify this. This is highly surprising,
given that one such source was mentioned in the original email in the
thread. Why have the sources not been added to the article?

-- 
Stephen Bain
stephen.bain at gmail.com