[WikiEN-l] The vexed issue of sources

[Ray Saintonge]

The Cunctator wrote:

>On 12/8/06, Daniel P. B. Smith <wikipedia2006 at dpbsmith.com> wrote:
>  
>
>>If the episode has _not_ been published on commercial videos, then
>>IMHO it is not verifiable. Of course, published print sources that
>>describe the episode are fine.
>>    
>>
>Of course it's verifiable. Verifiable means "able to be verified", not
>"commercially available."
>
Absolutely.  The person citing the episode may have taped it when it was 
broadcast.  That's certainly legal when someone is time shifting.  If 
the episode has not yet been made commercially available, I'm sure that 
the producers still have the episode in their archives somewhere.

Ec