[WikiEN-l] Blocking anon page creation was an experiment, wasn't it?

[Bryan Derksen]

David Gerard wrote:
> I think the Siegenthaler thing was more coincidental. We were getting
> a FIREHOSE of crap created daily. Still are, I think.

If we still are, then what was the point of stopping article creation by
non-logged-in users?

It's possible not as _much_ crap is being created daily, but that
remains to be proven by the analysis I've been asking about and not
seeing any trace of.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 250 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/wikien-l/attachments/20060825/eadbb89f/attachment.pgp