[WikiEN-l] Blocking anon page creation was an experiment, wasn't it?

[geni]

On 8/23/06, The Cunctator <cunctator at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/22/06, Delirium <delirium at hackish.org> wrote:
> > Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > >New articles are still important, as you've pointed out... But I've
> > >seen no evidence that new article creation belongs even on the top 100
> > >task list for making our encyclopedia not suck.
> > >
> > >
> > I'd certainly put it in the top 100, even the top 10, although probably
> > not the top 3.  When a user looks up an article, the worst possible
> > result would be to find a misleading or otherwise incorrect article.
>
> Why's that so bad? They can just edit it to fix it.
>

how do they know it is misleading or otherwise incorrect?
-- 
geni