[WikiEN-l] Challenge: explain NPOV in a sentence.

[David Gerard]

On 08/08/06, The Cunctator <cunctator at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 8/8/06, Fred Bauder <fredbaud at ctelco.net> wrote:
> > On Aug 7, 2006, at 10:40 PM, SPUI wrote:

> > >> Explain NPOV in a sentence.

> > > "Teach the controversy."

> > Outstanding!

> That presupposes there's a controversy. Or a legitimate controversy.
> Wikipedia has, and naturally should, a strong bias towards verifiable
> information.


"Teach the controversy, if its existence can be verified." This is
already enforceable using verifiability, to find *notable* critical
opinions to describe. It works okay.


- d.