[WikiEN-l] WikiEN-l Digest, Vol 33, Issue 152

[Sean Barrett]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Tony Sidaway stated for the record:

> On 4/24/06, Molu <loom91 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> 
>>"The recent fuss over Office actions demonstrates amply that even quite
>>well established administrators feel that they can challenge and
>>disregard the interests of the Foundation." Unfortunately it demonstrates nothing even remotely resembling the dark senario you choose to paint. No party involved *has* challenged, let alone felt entitled to challenge, the interests of the foundation.
> 
> 
> To be specific, Geni removed office protection from an article about a
> month ago without consulting Danny, and The Epopt, an arbitrator, has
> recently removed a block on an another editor imposed by Danny.  I
> don't need to paint any dark scenarios, they're already here. 
> Moreover the attacks on Office protection continue.

To be clear as well as specific, I objected to the block, not article
protection under the OFFICE policy.  I fully support OFFICE as a
mechanism to protect the Foundation's interests.

- --
 Sean Barrett     | Where there's a will, I want to be in it.
 sean at epoptic.org |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD4DBQFETPcvMAt1wyd9d+URAtfCAJ0cykEBdxGxAsKyPMq040xXfW6eRQCWLi0v
rZ3KJjxKE+G+JVeyVR26xw==
=xTRN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----