[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

[Sydney Poore]

Yes, I like that better. It is less specific but a strong statement. Be 
prepared for the argument that child erotica is different from child 
porn. I'm having that problem on the Child modeling (erotica) article 
now. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_modeling_%28erotic%29
Sydney

Steve Bennett wrote:
> On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster at davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
>   
>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> So, in other words, we need an accepted definition for what constitutes
>> deletable child porn on Wikipedia. Something like
>>
>> Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts
>> minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
>> Let's be stronger: Any image containing:
>> - elements of erotica,
>> - and depictions of people, real or fictitious, apparently under 18.
>>
>> I don't really see the argument for being inclusionist. Keeping
>> borderline cases causes us problems, and causes us to have to justify
>> those inclusions.
>>
>> Steve