[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

[Fred Bauder]

You are pointing to an important problem, mildly suggestive images  
are used by the mainstream media to say nothing of the obvious fact  
that it is normal for children to engage in innocent sexual behavior.

I think what we are after is those images (and sites) that cross over  
a poorly defined line into sexual exploitation of children. I would  
say that if some of our readers find an image or link objectionable,  
we should not include it. "Some" being a substantial fraction. We  
should not be mislead by our own reactions to an image. Having viewed  
goatse, our perspective is a bit warped.

Fred

On Apr 8, 2006, at 8:07 AM, Sydney Poore wrote:

> Minors engaged in sexually suggestive poses is too broad  Too many  
> movie
> posters and CD (album)  covers would be eliminated. Key to this is age
> appropriate sexual activity. Depictions of teens or pre-teens acting
> sexually suggestive towards each other is okay.
>
> Sydney
>
> Sam Korn wrote:
>
>> On 4/8/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster at davidarussell.co.uk>  
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Any image, whether a photograph, drawing, or render, which depicts
>>> minors engaged in sexual activity or sexually suggestive poses.
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Without wishing to be querulous, we then need to define "sexually
>> suggestive poses".
>>
>> --
>> Sam
>> _______________________________________________
>> WikiEN-l mailing list
>> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
>> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
>> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
> -- 
> Sydney Poore
>
> Go Bengals!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>