[WikiEN-l] Deleting the Lolicon picture

Katefan0 katefan0wiki at gmail.com
Mon Apr 3 19:50:15 UTC 2006


Yes. Some folks are beginning to remove the magazine photo altogether
because it's not "informative."

To me, a picture is better than no picture. Makes the article more
aesthetic.


k


On 4/3/06, Death Phoenix <originaldeathphoenix at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Looks to be potential edit warring arguing for the free image's removal
> because some of the magazines appear to be hentai instead of lolicon.
> Being
> a fan of neither, I have no idea what the difference is between the two,
> but
> some of the editors seem to be quite knowledgeable (and opinionated) about
> this matter.
>
> On 4/3/06, David Alexander Russell <webmaster at davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Let me repeat one thing - deleting this would NOT be outside policy or
> > out-of-process. If the image is replaced with the free image (the
> > japanese comic montage multiple people have mentioned) - which it SHOULD
> > be, since the free image is more informative - then it can be deleted
> > under existing Images/Media speedy deletion criterion #5 'Unused
> > copyrighted images. Images that are not under a free license or in the
> > public domain that are not used in any article'.
> >
> > Entirely in-process, entirely within policy, and this coming from a
> > self-confessed 'process wonk'.
> >
> > Cynical
> >
> > Mikkerpikker wrote:
> > > I'll repeat what I said at WP:AN/I, well done Sam. Brave move, and you
> > > have my support.
> > >
> > > On 4/3/06, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On 4/3/06, Sam Korn <smoddy at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> The image deletion process has shown itself incapable of removing
> this
> > >>> image.  The process is demonstrably broken when there is a hint of
> > >>> controversy.  I don't take stepping outside accepted policy and
> > >>> process lightly.  Here, however, it is absolutely right and
> absolutely
> > >>> necessary.
> > >>
> > >> Agreed. Let the accusations of cabalism begin.
> > >>
> > >> Ryan
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> WikiEN-l mailing list
> > >> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > >> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > >> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> > >>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
> > Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> >
> > iD8DBQFEMXqEg8fvtQYQevcRAvv1AKCM+9ful+o8jzxFkh1NMBqStN/15ACfS6Z+
> > wsmC4bmlPWaWBiEzi+ONkfA=
> > =2xcW
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > _______________________________________________
> > WikiEN-l mailing list
> > WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> > To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> > http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
> >
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l at Wikipedia.org
> To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
> http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
>



More information about the WikiEN-l mailing list