[WikiEN-l] Nature replies to Britannica

Mon Apr 3 09:06:57 UTC 2006

On 4/3/06, zero 0000 <nought_0000 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> Sorry if someone posted this already, but I didn't see it.

Don't think so. Thanks!

> publication more than the other. And of the 123 purported errors in
> question, Britannica takes issue with fewer than half.

This is very interesting - I had completely missed this when I read
the Britannica response. I thought they rejected almost everything.

Steve