[WikiEN-l] Page freezing on "good" articles

[Justin Cormack]

On 27 Oct 2005, at 17:16, Fastfission wrote:
> In my mind, it would make sense to have some sort of "Vote for
> Freezing" page for articles of this sort. It would be almost the
> opposite of something like VfD -- an advanced form of FAC, whereby
> people would vote (and ply some attention on) as to whether an article
> was good enough to qualify it for this sort of enshrinement. "This
> article is good enough that it doesn't need people to be able to edit
> it constantly without discussing changes first," the status of
> "frozen" would imply. Some standards would need to be developed (a FA
> which has already run on the main page, another round of peer review,
> no major rewrites in the past two months, etc.) but it could work out
> (hopefully). Requests for Unfreezing could be done as well for those
> who think that an article was problematically frozen in a state which
> would require more than just the sorts of line edits one can do from a
> talk page.

Show me an article so good that it cant be improved.

And reverting can be used to do this if you really want.

Justinc