[WikiEN-l] Unnecessary nudity on [[Hogtie bondage]]

[Alphax]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Sean Barrett wrote:
>>I looked the image used to illustrate [[Miniskirt]] is not Featured
>>Picture quality: it fails to capture the edginess or the sexiness that
>>this garment evokes in the popular imagination. However, it does the job
>>by illustrating what a miniskirt looks like -- & it is a free image.
> 
> 
> Sexiness is considered by many to be utterly intolerable.  See the
> "discussion" about the (professional, high-quality) picture that Bomis
> licensed GFDL for our use in the [[Bikini]] article.  It was lynched
> explicitly /because/ it was a good picture.  The attractiveness of the
> model was the stated reason for deleting it.
> 

Oh noes! Can't possibly have anything remotely attractive! Quick, remove
all the featured pictures and hit the stylesheets with an eggbeater!
While we're at it, better add IE-only HTML extensions and Javascript,
and re-implement the edit page in Flash.

- --
Alphax                      |   /"\
Encrypted Email Preferred   |   \ /     ASCII Ribbon Campaign
OpenPGP key ID: 0xF874C613  |    X   Against HTML email & vCards
http://tinyurl.com/cc9up    |   / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iQEVAwUBQ19Au7MAAH8MeUlWAQhdlAgArfGVHZosdcFmGCkTTHyCPWNo3IP/3EbO
L9yMg9H6EqyMfJROWGzs6AZ/ufUv3VIGIqckVZ3SNnOs3v/hP17Fg/Oi50uZNsG6
fJMOdCIw7c86lKyZVjHoyFLnRmJ/BxEN1UodPYT0tFqWLcbZlDnToIxLnrz32D/R
+seoJtyrNsh2InZSrmPEHBDRyAxJCoHKtJiI/GUB5Wd1tPx5u3FAU0Wijiczl7iM
54S9r34IckW2Mwzacyd/tgDvs7aI4Y6+dhze5fN2jNUbpGkGHqstb8ZapXgaMER8
7nBGzLeP30VZaNThk0CElpPB8fM/7ElpTjqVzs5DQQD7cuea3BpzHw==
=NVLk
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----