[WikiEN-l] Re: The whole point of wikipedia

[Tony Sidaway]

On 10/19/05, Martin Richards <Martin at velocitymanager.com> wrote:
>
> If you think all vandalism is noticed in RC then you are seriously wrong, it
> is totally unquestionable that a significant amount does get through, sure
> its not much compared to the total volume, but it is still way too much for
> an encyclopedia that is trying to establish credibility.


Show me some old vandalism.


>
> Sorry, in this case I was using vandalism as a blanket term for bad
> edting/POV pushing etc. not just outright vandalism, and as has been
> discussed, this is exactly the type of bad editting that erodes articles.


Yes. The point is, that isn't vandalism.