[WikiEN-l] Article quality deterioration (was: a valid criticism)

[geni]

On 10/11/05, Andrew Lih <andrew.lih at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 10/11/05, geni <geniice at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 10/11/05, Andrew Lih <andrew.lih at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > The marker system is easy to understand, straightforward to implement,
> > > minimally impacts current working methods, does not require agreed
> > > upon metric values, and is inherently wiki.
> >
> > So people just edit war over the position of the marker.
>
> Yes, that's why it's inherently wiki. :)
>
> But there's less disruption than trying to force your definitive edit
> in the "current" version.

No it isn't

--
geni