[WikiEN-l] a valid criticism

[Ryan Delaney]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
 
Stan Shebs wrote:

>
> 2. We need a way to discourage well-meaning but less-able editors
> from crumbling good articles. On my watchlist I see a lot of editors
> (some logins, some anons) adding nonsequiturs or redundancies,
> randomly rearranging text, adding useless templates en masse, etc.

I've actually had some luck with this. If someone makes an edit that
doesn't hurt anything, but doesn't add anything either, I simply
revert with the edit summary "rv: not an improvement". This seems to
send a message to people that edits need to be constructive and have a
plan behind them. Just moving stuff around isn't good for the Wiki,
and a solitary edit like this could seem to have no effect, but in the
aggregate they can make for a ridiculously disorganized article that
is not at all a pleasure to read.

- - Ryan
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
 
iD8DBQFDRcIE6MKb8lYmCtcRAnbaAJ0dZUo+XyEMRxrAXtNIXk7032HqOQCgtPl6
YUTli4cPlBGvt4kniU7nCdY=
=LLjj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----