[WikiEN-l] How many Arbitrators should we have?

[geni]

On 10/5/05, Snowspinner <Snowspinner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Oct 5, 2005, at 11:22 AM, DF wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Perhaps this just means we should expand the pool of
> > Arbitrators and elect 20 or 30 this time around as
> > some people had proposed (though one might have
> > trouble finding enough people to run).
> >
>
> The problem wouldn't be finding enough people to run. We had 34
> people running last time. The problem would be that, if we had taken
> 30 arbitrators last time, we'd have six arbitrators who are under
> various forms of arbcom parole, including one who is currently banned
> for a year.
>
> Best,
> Phil Sandifer

Perhaps but if that looked like happening I suspect more would run.


--
geni